If you saw the Oscars last night you know... and even if you didn't you have probably heard by now. For the first time in 83 years, the Oscars botched the Best Picture winner announcement. What's interesting to me is that PricewaterhouseCoopers are the ones taking the blame. Check out this article from the New York Times that breaks down what happened and why.
What went wrong?
Hollywood and movie lovers were reeling on Monday, trying to understand how PricewaterhouseCoopers, the accounting firm that oversees the voting, mistakenly allowed the Academy Award for best picture to go to “La La Land” Sunday night when “Moonlight” was the real winner. Details were still coming together on Monday, but several factors may have contributed to the error.
There are two identical sets of envelopes, handed out from either side of the stage.
The envelopes’ design was changed this year, to red paper with gold lettering, which may have made them harder to read.
And then there is simple human error, in the crucible of one of the most highly anticipated television moments of the year — the announcement of the best picture Oscar at the end of the ceremony.
It all added up to a nightmarish several minutes for PricewaterhouseCoopers.
For 83 years, the company has performed this task without any major snafus. But in one of the most astonishing moments in Oscars history, chaos engulfed the stage of the Dolby Theater in Hollywood, after “La La Land” was named the top picture. As the film’s producers were making acceptances speeches, awards show staff rushed onstage and began searching for the envelopes.
PricewaterhouseCoopers had given the presenters, Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty, the wrong envelope.
The stunning reversal instantly became the central theme of the Oscars, repeated endlessly on television and swamping social media. And just as quickly, PricewaterhouseCoopers, one of the so-called Big Four accounting firms, had a major brand crisis on its hands.
“Not since Janet Jackson and her wardrobe malfunction on the Super Bowl have we seen something quite as glaring as this snafu,” said Andrew D. Gilman, chief executive of the crisis communications firm CommCore Consulting Group. Although most of PricewaterhouseCoopers’s clients are aware that mistakes can happen, “the name of the firm has unfortunately been a little sullied,” he added.
The two identical sets of sealed envelopes are stationed on either side of the stage. The two PricewaterhouseCoopers partners who oversee the voting process, Martha L. Ruiz and Brian Cullinan, each have a briefcase with a complete set of the envelopes.
The envelope for best actress, the penultimate award of the night, came from one side of the stage.
After Emma Stone accepted that honor, Ms. Dunaway and Mr. Beatty came out to present best picture award. But they were handed an envelope from the other side of the stage, where the other best actress envelope was still unopened.
And Mr. Cullinan, who handed Mr. Beatty the envelope, clearly picked the wrong one.
After Mr. Cullinan and Ms. Ruiz realized that the wrong winner had been announced, they notified the stage manager, which set in motion a chaotic scene watched by the celebrity crowd in attendance and tens of millions of viewers on television.
Yet it still took more than two minutes between Ms. Dunaway announcing “La La Land” as best picture and an announcement from the “La La Land” producers that “Moonlight” was in fact the winner.
Why the wrong envelope was handed off is not yet clear. But it could have to do with the design. The envelopes containing the winner’s names were redesigned this year, and they featured red paper with gold lettering that specifies the award. Last year’s envelopes featured gold paper and red lettering, which may have been more legible. The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, not PricewaterhouseCoopers, is responsible for the design and procurement of the envelopes.
Those details, provided by people familiar with the process who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the episode was still being investigated, helped clarify some of what happened onstage on Sunday night.
PricewaterhouseCoopers declined to comment beyond the statement it put out early Monday morning accepting responsibility for the mix-up and apologizing to those involved.
“The presenters had mistakenly been given the wrong category envelope and when discovered, was immediately corrected,” the firm said in its statement. “We are currently investigating how this could have happened, and deeply regret that this occurred.”
PricewaterhouseCoopers, a privately held company, reported sales of $36 billion during its last fiscal year, up seven percent from the previous year. Revenue from the entertainment and media sector account for just 4.2 percent of sales. Based in London, the firm employs more than 220,000 people and provides accounting, tax advisory and consulting services to most of the world’s largest corporations.
The company promotes the firm’s longstanding relationship with the Academy Awards on its website.
One video posted there, introducing the leaders who oversaw this year’s ballots, began with the line: “The reason we were even first asked to take on this role was because of the reputation PwC has in the marketplace for being a firm of integrity, of accuracy and confidentiality.” It went on to note that the relationship was “symbolic of how we’re thought of beyond this role and how our clients think of us.”
The two PwC partners who oversee the Oscars' voting process Video by PwC US
This is not the first time an incorrect winner has been announced at the Oscars. In 1964, Sammy Davis Jr. announced the wrong winner for the best music score. But he quickly realized his mistake, before an erroneous winner was giving an acceptance speech.
“They gave me the wrong envelope,” Mr. Davis said at the time. “Wait till the NAACP hears about this.”
He soon had the correct envelope in hand and announced the correct winner. “I ain’t gonna make no mistake this time, baby,” he said.
But never before has PricewaterhouseCoopers made such an enormous mistake at such a pivotal moment during the Oscars.
“I’m sure there will be a logical explanation for what happened, but they’re going to be the butt of jokes for late-night TV for at least a week, there will be memes written, and I think it’ll be interesting to see if they hold on to their contract,” Mr. Gilman said. “They have branded themselves around this event saying, ‘We’re trusted’ — that’s the implication. Now, I think that will take a hit.”
Original article by By David Gelles and Sapna Maheshwari of The New York Times
Correction: February 27, 2017
An earlier version of this article misidentified the location of the Dolby Theater. It is in Hollywood, not downtown Los Angeles.
Showing posts with label accounting firm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label accounting firm. Show all posts
Monday, February 27, 2017
Friday, October 9, 2015
Office Position Available
Job title: Receptionist and Office Assistant
Reports to: General Manager
Job purpose
We are looking for a receptionist and office assistant to interface with our clients and support
our accounting staff. In addition, this position is responsible for client invoicing and payments.
The ideal candidate will be experienced in customer service and interaction. This position is the
face and voice of the company, so this person MUST have the attributes and experience that
are required to manage client interactions and interface with staff to meet company goals.
Duties and responsibilities
Administration
Greet and provide support to visitors
Manage incoming calls, faxes, mail, and e-mails and distribute to staff
Manage outgoing faxes and mail
Manage office supply list and associated ordering
File creation and filing
Maintain general office organization
Assist general manager with administrative tasks
Create and manage production software, specifically with project creation
Accounts Receivable
Create monthly, quarterly, and general invoices in QuickBooks and CRM
Process recurring payments
Process payments
Client interaction, directed by general manager, for collection of payment
Production Assistance
Scanning and copying for accountants
Data entry during overflow periods
Qualifications
The ideal candidate will have many of these qualities.
Reliable, prompt, and professional
Comfort and skill working with clients that may be challenging at times
Extremely organized
Comfortable working with little oversight
Willing to learn and perhaps improve on office practices
The ideal candidate will have these credentials.
High school diploma or GED
Proficiency in Microsoft Office (Outlook, Excel, & Word)
Minimum of 3 years in customer service or equivalent
The ideal candidate will learn and grow in these areas
Proficiency in Excel
Proficiency in QuickBooks
Proficiency in our contact and production management software
Working conditions
Our office is both professional and relaxed. We are not a strictly hierarchical office, rather we
approach client service as a team, in which we all have different roles and responsibilities.
The office is located near the intersection of Parham and Patterson. Beginning hours are
Monday through Thursday 9AM-1PM. There is potential for increased hours and
responsibilities associated with this position.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)